AIP in the News
The Daily Herald
Sept. 15, 2002
Study shows a well-greased O'Hare wheel
But politicians deny donations from expansion supporters influenced
views
By Eric Krol, Daily Herald Political Writer
The push to get expansion of O'Hare International Airport through
Congress is being greased by well-timed campaign contributions and
a phony public relations effort cooked up by civic leaders whose
companies hold $217 million in airport contracts, a new documentary
and report funded by an anti-O'Hare group claims.
The four-month investigation by the Aviation Integrity Project
is part of a major PR offensive of its own to persuade Chicago and
suburban residents to lobby elected officials to stop plans for
new runways at the world's busiest airport.
The report and documentary plot out the timeline of several key
politicians' positions on O'Hare, when they got campaign contributions
from airline interests, and when those politicians changed their
minds to support expansion.
"What you see is if you have enough money, a public relations
firm and make enough campaign contributions, you can override ordinary,
unfortunate people living in the suburbs someplace," said Terrence
Brunner, the project's director and former head of the watchdog
Better Government Association.
A spokeswoman for U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, one of the politicians
taken to task in the report, said it's only natural for Durbin,
who's up for re-election this fall, to get campaign contributions
from businesses that support O'Hare, because nearly all companies
in the state support the plan for its expected economic benefits.
"This is an overblown attack from the Suburban O'Hare Commission
to try to turn such a positive for the Chicago area into a negative,"
spokeswoman Stacey Zolt said, referring to another prominent anti-O'Hare
group.
The aviation group will release its report Monday and the following
day begin airing its 10-minute documentary on AT&T Cable television
for 10 days, a unique approach Brunner said hasn't been done before.
The aviation project, funded by anti-expansion Bensensville, Elk
Grove Village, Wood Dale and Park Ridge, is spending $100,000 to
air it infomercial-style as a local cut-in program on national stations
like TNT, TBS and MTV.
The tongue-in-cheek documentary features radio show host Cliff
Kelly of WVON 1450-AM collecting donations from regular people "to
buy back Congress."
"We're showing real people, and how congressional campaign
contributions and congressional decisions affect them," Brunner
said.
The deal between Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley and Gov. George
Ryan to add new runways at O'Hare would require demolition of more
than 500 homes in Bensenville and 50 companies in Elk Grove Village's
tax-producing business park.
Once considered a slam-dunk, the O'Hare deal passed the House in
July but is stalled in the Senate. Durbin has said he has enough
votes to bypass delay tactics by Sen. Peter Fitzgerald, the Inverness
Republican who opposes the expansion, but has yet to call the measure
for a vote as time ticks down on Congress this year.
Naming names
The overarching theme of the aviation project's report is that
several politicians who claimed to support campaign finance reform
to limit special interests' influence changed their positions on
O'Hare after getting contributions from United and American airlines
and the airline industry.
Durbin, a Springfield Democrat, had remained neutral on O'Hare
expansion when 14 top executives from American gave $16,250 to his
campaign fund in December 2000, followed by $6,000 from United executives
in April 2001, the report states. The following month, Durbin changed
his position to supporting new runways at O'Hare and is sponsoring
the legislation in the Senate.
All told, Durbin has collected $109,907 from airlines, the airline
industry and pro-expansion forces since 1997, according to the report.
Durbin spokeswoman Zolt said there is "absolutely no correlation"
between the airline campaign donations and Durbin's decision to
support expansion.
"This is old news. This is an old, recycled press release
to stop the expansion of O'Hare," said Zolt, referring to the
same group's call last April for Durbin to return O'Hare-related
contributions.
Rep. Mark Kirk, a Highland Park Republican, also is criticized
in the report for not taking a position on O'Hare expansion during
his 2000 run for Congress and later becoming a House leader in working
for its passage. Kirk has received $44,700 in campaign contributions
from pro-O'Hare interests, the report states.
Kirk said he did not take a position on O'Hare during his campaign
because the issue was dead because of Gov. George Ryan's then-opposition
to new runways.
"If I did not have a dime, I'd be totally pro-O'Hare,"
Kirk said. "My district was hit hard by the recession."
Kirk also said the new runway plan would move noise pollution away
from towns in his congressional district like Palatine and Arlington
Heights.
House Speaker Dennis Hastert, a Yorkville Republican, also remained
neutral on O'Hare until the measure stalled in the House earlier
this summer. Then he worked to assure its passage. Hastert has received
$27,500 from pro-O'Hare interests, the report states.
Hastert spokesman John McGovern said the speaker previously hadn't
taken positions on specific O'Hare plans, but he has long supported
efforts to improve efficiency at the airport.
The report also criticizes several lawmakers from other states,
including Democratic Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa. Harkin, who is up
for re-election this fall, became one of the early leaders for O'Hare
expansion in the fall of 2000 after getting $8,000 from eight top
American executives in the summer of 2000, according to the report.
Harkin has collected $40,500 since 2000 from pro-expansion interests,
the report states.
A Harkin spokesman said the senator has argued for solving O'Hare's
notorious delays for more than a decade, including in a 1991 speech
in Chicago during his run for president.
"Air travel is just too important to Iowans and the Iowa economy
to play politics with," Harkin spokesman Bill Burton said.
"This is an outrageous political attack."
A spokesman for United Airlines said he had no comment until seeing
the aviation group's report. American could not be reached for comment.
O'Hare motivation
The report's other thrust is to blast the city's "carefully
orchestrated, coordinated and calculated" public relations
campaign "vilifying and marginalizing O'Hare opponents as a
'small minority of suburban residents.' " More than 1 million
suburban residents live in towns affected by the expansion, Brunner
argues.
Singled out for scorn is a full-page newspaper ad taken out in
May 2001 by the Civic Committee of the Commercial Club of Chicago
calling for new runways at O'Hare. Of the 60 corporate executives
who signed the ad, 13 work for companies that have city contracts
for $217 million worth of business at O'Hare, showing a conflict
of interest, Brunner said. An airport expansion would only increase
that figure, he said.
Among the companies doing business with the airport are Chicago
Title and Trust, which has O'Hare contracts totaling $115 million;
Bank One, which has contracts for $2.1 million; and Material Services,
which does $62,238 worth of O'Hare work.
"Obviously, the downtown fat cats who are saying O'Hare expansion
is good for Chicago are really talking about for the good of themselves,"
Brunner said.
R. Eden Martin, the civic committee's president, said the ad isn't
phony.
"If they read the ad, the argument is, there is a strong economic
interest (in expanding O'Hare)," Martin said. "They're
wrong if they link it to contracts. That's only a tiny part of it."
O'Hare expansion will bring $10 billion a year of economic growth
to Chicago, according to a study touted by Daley. "It seems
to me they're focusing on the hair on the tail of the dog,"
Martin said.
Brunner disputes the validity of the study that $10 billion figure
is based on, saying documents O'Hare expansion opponents obtained
in a lawsuit show the study was unduly influenced by Daley political
allies.
The city's aviation spokeswoman did not return calls seeking comment.
|